The arXiv paper
One paper carries the part of this programme that was held to a publication standard. It is a 98-page selection of the eight papers below — not a summary of them, but the subset that survived the process described here.
What "refereed" means here
The text went through fourteen blind referee rounds, each read by a fresh model instance with no memory of the previous round, each returning a written report with blockers. Every printed constant was re-derived centrally, at the site, rather than accepted from the report. The last round returned no mathematical error in any proof and no printed constant that failed to reproduce.
Everything on the rest of this site is outside that process.
The reading form and the PDF are generated from the same source file, so they carry the same text; the PDF is the typeset version of record.
Status
The paper is built and frozen. The arXiv identifier will appear here on posting — until then the copy above is a pre-posting draft, and the paper says so in its own front matter: a copy with no persistent identifier is a draft.
The other 34 claims
The programme records 62 substantive claims. The paper carries 28. The rest are either measured under a pre-registered gate but never searched against the literature, or exploratory observations that were recorded and never gated. They are all in the eight papers on this site, which is the reason this site exists.